Friday, March 31, 2017
Olive Farmer and Aktina Pempti: Is NOW the time?
Olive Farmer and Aktina Pempti: Is NOW the time?: Everywhere, the state operates as the control system on behalf of the elite that shapes reality. It is aided and abetted by the debt-mone...
Thursday, March 30, 2017
911 WAS an Inside Job
THE MOSt important film of our era. False flag, Operation Gladio,
telegraphed with a big brass marching band. Secret societies
(Spectre), terrorizing the populace to insure the continuation of their
own hyper surveillance and security apparatus'. It is all right
there for everyone to see.https://gomovies.to/film/007-spectre-6450/watching.html?ep=116380
Review: ‘Karl Marx City’ Revisits the Everyday Terror of Dictatorship
https://nyti.ms/2nJCF9v
**** profound moral and emotional stakes. Repressive regimes excel at creating ambiguity, at making complicity easier than resistance and at blurring the lines between heroes and villains.****
**** profound moral and emotional stakes. Repressive regimes excel at creating ambiguity, at making complicity easier than resistance and at blurring the lines between heroes and villains.****
Monday, March 27, 2017
Monday, March 20, 2017
Dave McGowan's Lost WBAI Interview from 2014
http://inothernewsradio.com/podcast/in-other-news-september-22-2014/
This is the first hour of a two hour interview. The second hour was not nearly as good. I will also include the second hour below
http://inothernewsradio.com/?s=Laurel+Canyon
Saturday, March 18, 2017
The Cyclic Theme of the Despotism of Empire.
https://mikemcclaughry.wordpress.com/2017/03/11/the-anti-scientology-movement-and-the-catholic-league-absolute-suppression-of-dissention/
Exquisite link above!
Roman Empire/Vatican mergers into British Empire merges into American Empire. All three with strangely similar characteristics of despotic rule. All three reflecting a Feudalism of haves crushing the have nots with almost identical methodologies.
Exquisite link above!
Roman Empire/Vatican mergers into British Empire merges into American Empire. All three with strangely similar characteristics of despotic rule. All three reflecting a Feudalism of haves crushing the have nots with almost identical methodologies.
Thursday, March 16, 2017
Sunday, March 12, 2017
Saturday, March 11, 2017
Thursday, March 9, 2017
Sunday, March 5, 2017
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Friday, March 3, 2017
Thursday, March 2, 2017
The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: That lousy speech by Bernie Sanders at J Street co...
The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: That lousy speech by Bernie Sanders at J Street co...: It is a lousy speech by all means. Here are excerpts: "and removed the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon from the list of global...
That lousy speech by Bernie Sanders at J Street conference
That lousy speech by Bernie Sanders at J Street conference
It is a lousy speech by all means. Here are excerpts:
"and removed
the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon from the list of global
threats." Notice he does not care say a word about the threat of
Israel's WMDs.
The criteria
for Sandars are always (like every member of US congress) is the
security of the occupation state: "In contrast, the Iran nuclear deal
helped the security of the U.S. and its partners – yes, it helped the
security of Israel, as many Israeli security experts have
acknowledged".
He then
brazenly says: "I saw and experienced for myself many of the progressive
values upon which the State of Israel was founded." Yes, Israel was
founded on such progressive values: ethnic cleansing, occupation,
settler colonialism, mass explosion, apartheid, sectarianism, massacres
and war crimes. But this Vermont Senator was very impressed.
"to
acknowledge the enormous achievement of establishing a democratic
homeland for the Jewish people". Would you support a homeland for
Muslim people? How could a secular support a religious identity based
state? And democratic? You mean democratic for the European Jewish
segment of the population but not for the rest, right?
Whenever
someone uses the word "painful" about Israeli war crimes, I know that
the person is about to justify war crimes. Also, the analogy with the
US is intended to convince listeners that it is OK and that the victims
have to move on: "But as you all know, there was another side to the
story of Israel’s creation, a more painful side. Like our own country,
the founding of Israel involved the displacement of hundreds of
thousands of people already living there, the Palestinian people. Over
700,000 people were made refugees."
And here he
provides the typical ignorant narrative: "Nobody gains when children are
trained to be suicide bombers." Nobody is training anyone on anything.
Some people are driven to commit extreme acts of violence by virtue of
the mass violence of the occupiers. Read Richard Pepe's Dying to Win and
you will understand what you are ignorant of: regarding the impact of
foreign occupation on the occupied.
He concludes the speech by asserting that in his view George W. Bush has the best solution to the conflict.
"and removed
the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon from the list of global
threats." Notice he does not care say a word about the threat of
Israel's WMDs.
The criteria
for Sandars are always (like every member of US congress) is the
security of the occupation state: "In contrast, the Iran nuclear deal
helped the security of the U.S. and its partners – yes, it helped the
security of Israel, as many Israeli security experts have
acknowledged".
He then
brazenly says: "I saw and experienced for myself many of the progressive
values upon which the State of Israel was founded." Yes, Israel was
founded on such progressive values: ethnic cleansing, occupation,
settler colonialism, mass explosion, apartheid, sectarianism, massacres
and war crimes. But this Vermont Senator was very impressed.
"to
acknowledge the enormous achievement of establishing a democratic
homeland for the Jewish people". Would you support a homeland for
Muslim people? How could a secular support a religious identity based
state? And democratic? You mean democratic for the European Jewish
segment of the population but not for the rest, right?
Whenever
someone uses the word "painful" about Israeli war crimes, I know that
the person is about to justify war crimes. Also, the analogy with the
US is intended to convince listeners that it is OK and that the victims
have to move on: "But as you all know, there was another side to the
story of Israel’s creation, a more painful side. Like our own country,
the founding of Israel involved the displacement of hundreds of
thousands of people already living there, the Palestinian people. Over
700,000 people were made refugees."
And here he
provides the typical ignorant narrative: "Nobody gains when children are
trained to be suicide bombers." Nobody is training anyone on anything.
Some people are driven to commit extreme acts of violence by virtue of
the mass violence of the occupiers. Read Richard Pepe's Dying to Win and
you will understand what you are ignorant of: regarding the impact of
foreign occupation on the occupied.
He concludes the speech by asserting that in his view George W. Bush has the best solution to the conflict.